This platform can be tuned to match dozens of election styles, from a quick team poll to a formally governed AGM. Pick and combine whichever tools your rules call for — the core toolkit is included at no extra cost, and the security add-ons below are there for when a vote calls for extra scrutiny.
Jump here from any pill above, or scroll through the full set below.
Nobody — not even the poll organizer or the team running the platform — can trace a submitted choice back to the person who cast it. That keeps voters free to answer honestly, especially when the person overseeing the vote is also a candidate in it.
Picture a workplace survey about a manager's performance: without this separation, few people would answer truthfully. With it, they can.
In places where literacy or language varies widely, a picture communicates instantly in a way words alone can't. Each answer option can carry an image alongside its label, so voters recognize their choice at a glance rather than having to read and translate it first.
A vote isn't locked in the moment it's submitted — a voter can go back and change their answer any time before the poll closes. That matters when opinions shift, say after hearing a debate, and it also gives someone who felt pressured into a choice a private chance to correct it later.
Normally these two goals fight each other — a fully traceable log tends to expose who voted for what, while full anonymity makes disputes hard to settle. Combining strong identity checks with encryption lets both live side by side, so a contested result can still be verified end-to-end without unmasking a single voter.
Some elections aren't about picking one winner — they're about filling several seats at once, like a management committee. This lets a poll ask voters to choose exactly (or up to) a set number of names from a list, and blocks submission until the count is right.
Not every poll is a single yes-or-no question. Up to ten separate questions can be bundled into one ballot, so a voter answers everything in one sitting instead of clicking through multiple separate polls.
Organizers don't have to wait until a poll closes to see how things stand — a live list shows exactly who has voted and who hasn't, so reminders can go out to the right people while there's still time.
After voting, each person gets a personal record of their submission by SMS, email, or on-screen printout. It's the same idea behind a printed voting-machine slip — if anyone ever questions whether the count is accurate, these receipts can be checked against the tally.
Online voting carries a perceived risk that a vote could be altered in transit between a voter's device and the server. Before anything is finalized, the system shows the voter exactly what they selected and asks them to confirm or change it, closing that gap.
Rather than a generic mass email, each voter gets an invite addressed to them personally — including the practical details they'll need, like where to log in or what ID to have ready. Voters are more likely to respond to something that clearly was meant for them.
Not every vote has to count the same. In some elections — a lender vote, or a shareholder resolution — a person's influence should scale with their stake. This applies that scaling automatically instead of leaving it to error-prone manual math after the fact.
This goes a step further than a receipt: it lets a voter pull their vote directly from the server at any time to confirm it still matches what they submitted. If anything were ever altered after the fact, the discrepancy would be visible — transparency is the strongest defense against tampering.
Beyond the initial invite, the system tracks who hasn't voted yet and can send them a nudge — all without the organizer having to chase people down individually.
Voters cast their ballot from their own phone or computer — no physical booth, no travel, no waiting in line. Removing that friction is usually the single biggest lever for improving turnout.
A ballot isn't limited to one style of question. Choose from a single pick, multiple selections, ranked preferences, or open-ended written answers — whatever format fits the decision being made.
A vote only means something if the right people — and only the right people — are the ones casting it. This lets an organizer define exactly who's eligible in advance, so the poll is only reachable by voters on that list.
Every poll needs a defined window to be meaningful. Set an opening and closing time in advance — or save a poll as a draft and schedule it to go live automatically later.
Building a poll from scratch each time — especially one with images already uploaded — takes longer than it should. Instead, copy the setup of a previous poll and adjust it, saving both time and effort.
Votes are tallied automatically as they come in, with no manual counting required. For polls where showing a live trend isn't desirable, the same platform can also hold results back until the poll has closed.
Instead of re-typing the same names into every new poll, save a group once and simply select it the next time you need to invite that same set of people.
For any vote where stakes are high, the first concern is usually whether the system itself can be trusted. Every step of the voting process is encrypted end to end, so vote data can't be read or altered as it moves through the system.
Some elections need voters to formally agree to specific terms — a confidentiality clause, a liability waiver, or similar — before they're allowed to vote. This adds that agreement as a required step, and only voters who accept it can proceed to the ballot.
An organizer decides when results actually get calculated. For sensitive polls — a national-scale election, say — showing a running trend could itself influence the outcome, so results can be held back and only computed once voting has fully closed.
To prevent any one person from having unchecked control over an election, a poll created by one person ("the maker") must be reviewed and approved by a separate person ("the checker") before it goes live. An independent scrutinizer — often an outside professional — can also be given visibility into the results to confirm nothing was manipulated.
Voters shouldn't have to dig through old emails or texts to find their ballot. A direct link takes them straight to the voting page and can be shared over SMS, email, or any social platform.
On a ballot with more than one question, a voter can be allowed to leave a specific question blank rather than answer it. This matters when a question touches on something a voter might rather not answer — without this option, they might abandon the whole poll instead.
An organizer controls exactly who sees the results and when — visible to everyone including voters, restricted to the organizer alone, or held back entirely until the poll has closed.
Voters can suggest an option that isn't on the original list, and once nominated, that new option becomes visible — and votable — for everyone who votes afterward. For an "employee of the year" style award, for instance, this lets staff nominate names beyond whichever shortlist was originally proposed, making the outcome feel more representative.
A personalized invite isn't always the right fit — sometimes an organizer (or a candidate) wants to reach their entire audience at once. A poll's link can be shared in one click across SMS, WhatsApp, email, and social platforms.
Every poll a voter has been specifically invited to shows up in one place, so they don't need to search their inbox or texts for a link. It also keeps out any polls they weren't invited to, so nothing irrelevant shows up.
When voting happens remotely, there's always a risk that someone else casts the vote on a person's behalf. Requiring a quick photo at the moment of voting confirms an actual person, not a stand-in, is behind the screen.
Along with each vote, the system can record roughly where it was cast from — useful for spotting how results vary by region. A poll about favorite sports, for example, might look very different once you separate out where each vote actually came from geographically.
For situations where no single administrator should be trusted to see results alone, this works like a bank safety-deposit box: results only unlock once several authorized people each enter their own one-time code, so no one person can view or announce them solo.
Impersonation is one of the hardest problems in election management. Before letting someone vote, the system can capture their photo and match it against their photo on file — voting only proceeds once the two match.
Voting can be limited to a specific geographic area, so anyone outside that boundary is blocked from participating. This avoids the problem where a poll intended for one city's residents ends up flooded with votes from far outside it, skewing the result.
A voter's login code is sent to both their registered email and mobile number at the same moment, so a delay or failure on one channel doesn't leave them stuck — if the SMS is slow, the email still works, and vice versa.
Invitations, login codes, and confirmations are also delivered over WhatsApp alongside the usual SMS and email, since many voters check WhatsApp more often than either. This extra channel helps make sure nothing important gets missed, especially among younger or more mobile-first voters.
For elections where the stakes justify it, a voter has to pass a second identity check in addition to their usual login — options include a mobile or email one-time code, an ID-based verification, a fingerprint or iris scan, or facial matching. It does add a few extra seconds to voting, so it's best reserved for polls where the added assurance is worth the friction.
To limit the risk of one person voting repeatedly — or collecting other people's login details to vote on their behalf — the system can restrict voting to one submission per internet connection. It's also flexible enough to allow a small number of shared votes from one connection, which covers cases like a household or a shared office Wi-Fi network.
A voter's identity can be verified in real time against a government ID database, through a fingerprint scan, an iris scan, or a one-time code sent to the mobile number registered against that ID. Because it doesn't rely on a human booth attendant's judgment, it removes a layer of inconsistency that in-person ID checks can have.
An organizer can pre-approve the specific network addresses that are allowed to vote from — useful when the goal is to keep the convenience of online voting while still requiring voters to be physically present at designated locations. This suits situations like a professional body wanting members to vote only from approved centers, combining the speed of automated counting with the structure of a booth system.
Under this counting method, each voter ranks the candidates rather than picking just one, and the system works out the winner(s) by transferring votes from the lowest-ranked candidates until enough candidates cross the threshold. This kind of count is normally painstaking to do by hand — some real-world elections that use it can take days — but it's calculated automatically here in a couple of minutes.
Normally, an organizer supplies their own voter list up front. As an added service, this can instead collect and verify voter details directly — voters fill in a registration form themselves, with fields like mobile number, email, and ID verified automatically through one-time codes, plus an optional upload of supporting documents for manual review.
For the highest level of tamper-resistance, each vote can be recorded as a linked, encrypted entry in a blockchain. Because each entry is cryptographically tied to the one before it, altering or deleting any past vote would require rewriting the entire chain after it — which is effectively impossible without being detected.
Some organizations are required to reserve certain seats for specific categories — women, senior members, a particular community, or whatever their bylaws specify. Reservation rules can be defined per position ahead of time and are then enforced automatically, so results always honor those quotas without anyone doing the math by hand afterward.
A missed invitation is one of the most common reasons someone doesn't vote. This lets an organizer set both a primary login identity and a secondary contact method for each voter, so invites and reminders go out on two channels — useful when someone uses a work email for official matters but rarely checks it, or switches devices often.
Some polls are about audience engagement more than a strict one-person-one-vote rule — a talent-show-style vote, for instance, where fans can vote repeatedly for a favorite act. This setting allows exactly that kind of repeated voting.
Rather than a password to remember, a voter confirms who they are with a one-time code — the same familiar approach used for banking and other secure logins. Voters can only get in with an ID that's actually on the voter list, so someone can't log in and vote on another person's behalf.
Some situations call for gathering quick, anonymous public opinion rather than running a formal, login-based election — a conference-room straw poll or an exit-poll-style survey, for example. Anyone can vote directly without logging in, while the system still caps it at one vote per device and per network to keep the results credible.
If a voter's usual one-time code doesn't arrive — due to a network delay or a delivery failure — an alternative verification path kicks in after about a minute, offering a phone call or a QR-code-based check instead. This keeps a voter from getting locked out simply because one delivery channel had a hiccup.
Instead of digging through raw numbers, organizers get charts covering turnout, participation over time, and device or browser trends — enough to spot a stalled poll early and send a reminder before it closes.
For a poll with a small, fixed group of voters, it's common for everyone to finish voting well before the scheduled closing time. Rather than waiting it out, an organizer can close the poll early once every eligible voter has responded (or once the election committee is satisfied), letting results be finalized sooner.